驳斥“WADA律师精彩发问,呈现孙杨方崩溃”一文( 二 )

)” , 且H.5.4规定:“Only Sample Collection Personnel who have an accreditation recognised by the Sample Collection Authority shall be authorised by the Sample Collection Authority to conduct Sample collection activities on behalf of the Sample Collection Authority(只有获得样品采集机构认可的认证的样品采集人员才应获得样品采集机构的授权 , 代表样品采集机构开展样品采集活动)” , 由此可见 , 理查德·杨的话对于内行的人来说 , 只能当个屁放了得了 。三、理查德·杨律师认为国际检查和调查标准并没有要求给陪同员发资格证 , 咋一看 , 没错!但被韩照歧一个反诘:“那我们怎么确认他们的资格?”理查德·杨律师立马尴尬了!再来看看《检测与调查国际准则(ISTI)》第3.2条检测和调查国际标准专用术语解释:“Chaperone: An official who is trained and authorized by the Sample Collection Authority to carry out specific duties including one or more of the following (at the election of the Sample Collection Authority): notification of the Athlete selected for Sample collection; accompanying and observing the Athlete until arrival at the Doping Control Station; accompanying and/or observing Athletes who are present in the Doping Control Station; and/or witnessing and verifying the provision of the Sample where the training qualifies him/her to do so” , 其中明确规定陪同人员也必须是经样本采集机构授权 , 才能执行具体职责!换句话来说 , 陪同人员没有资格证可以 , 但监督孙杨尿检的“陪同人员”必须得有IDTM公司的授权证明!孙杨案中的这位DCA(尿检官) , 只是主检官杨冰柔从微信圈临时找来的同学 , 有授权吗?这么做符合《检测与调查国际准则(ISTI)》关于样本采集人员资质和授权的规定吗?来骗傻子啊?(未完待续)


推荐阅读