江苏龙网

  1. 首页 > 资讯 > 资讯 > >

新浪科技综合：为何科学家们会反对一个 “戴口罩” 的研究？新浪科技综合2020-07-11 10:32:410阅( 三 )


而对于 PNAS 的这篇论文 ， PNAS 主编、伊利诺伊大学香槟分校的进化生物学家 May Berenbaum 6月中旬在回应媒体时表示 ， 她已经听到对该论文的批评 ， 正在了解该论文发表是否符合 “投稿” 规则 <5> 。 目前 ， 在 PNAS 的网页上 ， 这篇论文显示获得了九千多个赞；而在推特上 ， 网友们纷纷转发该文 ， 作为需要佩戴口罩的科学证据 。
<1>https：//www.pnas.org/content/117/26/14857
<2>https：//www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1995/press-release/
<3>https：//metrics.stanford.edu/PNAS%20retraction%20request%20LoE%20061820
<4>https：//www.pnas.org/page/authors/journal-policies
<5>https：//www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/mario-molina-coronavirus-face-masks-pnas
<6>https：//www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/036616v2
<7>https：//www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/07/07/884957449/the-pandemic-is-pushing-scientists-to-rethink-how-they-read-research-papers
<8>https：//www.theguardian.com/science/2020/may/28/questions-raised-over-hydroxychloroquine-study-which-caused-who-to-halt-trials-for-covid-19
<9>https：//www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225？source=nejmtwitter&amp;medium=organic-social
<9> https：//www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-08/coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-farce-has-tragic-consequences
<10>https：//theconversation.com/retractions-and-controversies-over-coronavirus-research-show-that-the-process-of-science-is-working-as-it-should-140326
<11>https：//www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and
<12>https：//www.statnews.com/2020/06/16/hydroxychloroquine-emergency-use-patients-politicians/
<13>https：//www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-08/coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-farce-has-tragic-consequences
<14>https：//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/docsum
<15>https：//retractionwatch.com/2020/06/19/i-agree-with-your-conclusions-completely-and-your-paper-is-still-terrible/
<16>https：//www.natureindex.com/news-blog/scientists-reveal-what-they-learnt-from-their-biggest-mistakes


推荐阅读


上一篇：新疆扶贫女书记心中的美丽“康村”

下一篇：夜宿布热村